A large part of Measure A will end up providing freeway infrastructure
to serve March GlobalPort at March Air Base. Not really for "Riverside,"
but for something called "Greater Los Angeles."
What's so bad about that, you ask. Doesn't that mean jobs?
Not the kind of jobs we need. To the extent it means "new jobs,"
it means low end warehouse, plane refueling type jobs. With probably
lots of unskilled labor showing up to compete against our existing base
of unskilled labor for the very same jobs. This is not "visionary"
planning. This is "cargo pit for Los Angeles" planning.
But March will also bring:
- Acres and acres of semi-tractor/trailer rigs on our already congested
freeways.
- Tons and Tons of toxic pollutants, spewing out of diesel trucks,
diesel trains and large cargo jets.
- uncontrolled population growth
- reduced property values everywhere in the flight path and airport
vicinity (unless you own a warehouse or the like ...)
- unbearable traffic on thoroughfares such as Van Buren and Allesandro
The best way to understand the planned March Development
is to read up on the "benefits" March GlobalPort and the Joint Powers Authority
are selling to potential cargo businesses.
First of all,
you have no say. You didn't
know that, did you? But read it direct from them:
"The March JPA has streamlined the way to do business in California.
The March JPA has land use authority, and is responsible for all entitlements,
building permits, and clearances. Furthermore, the March JPA formed a California
Redevelopment Agency and project area to assist with development of MIP.
This means, that all business dealings at MIP are conducted with "one" cohesive
legislative group. March Inland Port is open for business today. All criteria
and regulations have been satisfied, and March Inland Port Airport Authority
is ready to do business." MarchJPA
(The links that follow are all on the March Inland Cargo Port Development,
LLC site. However, because they are in frames, I have had to link
the specific frame, and you will not see their logo and headings. You
can look at the whole page as they have presented it here.)
Yes, everything is streamlined here in the Inland Empire, because we have
a
"pro-business government" unlike, say Los Angeles, which hates business
altogether, I suppose. Here's how GlobalPort presents it:
"
6. Pro-business Local Government: March Joint Powers Authority consists
of local government representatives from the surrounding cities of Riverside,
Moreno Valley and Perris. They are pro-business and are dedicated to making
March the best air cargo and distribution location in the west." March Inland Cargo Port
Development, LLC
(In other words, we've been sold out.)
Now, the reason March is so attractive is that it can handle a
really
lot of cargo from all over the place. San Diego doesn't have
adequate capacity, so March will be San Diego's cargo airport as well as
Los Angeles' cargo airport -- it is presently trucking 80% of its cargo
to LAX or Ontario.
March Inland Cargo Port
Development, LLC.
In fact, because our local government representatives are
unable to find any urban development anywhere in proximity to March, the
GlobalPort has room to grow, and grow and grow:
"8. Long-Term Growth: Compared to most commercial airports in the
country, MICP is still relatively free of urban encroachment. This gives
March the opportunity and room to expand its cargo and distribution facilities.
It currently has 330 acres of developable land on both sides of the runway."
March Inland
Cargo Port Development, LLC
How much does that add up to in terms of cargo? Well --
"March can handle more than 1.2 million tons of cargo per year, which
is about 14 % of the regional and 20% of international volumes predicted
for 2016." March
Inland Cargo Port Development, LLC.
But the question is, will you want to be living here when that happens?
Your next question -- I'm sure you are wondering -- is, who precisely
are the people behind all this development. Well, of course they have
already told you it is your very own "pro-business" local government representatives.
But let's get a bit more specific. Who is behind March GlobalPort?
Well, the key developer is The Lynx Group, out of Texas. But The
Lynx Group has some very important local partners, names you have heard
over and over. Such as,
"MARION ASHLEY President, Ashley Capital and County Lands Inc."
Ashley just happens to also be, the
"former chair and member of
the Riverside County Planning Commission and current director and immediate
past president of the Eastern Municipal Water District."
So, that is one of the many
"pro-business" local representatives
at work bringing you GlobalPort.
[Ashley update 9/09/02 -- I checked the GlobalPort website
today and since my last viewing of it, Mr. Ashley has been removed from the
list of participants. As you may know, Mr. Ashley is running for Riverside
County Board of Supervisors--with a broad coalition of endorsements--and
is almost certain to win. I wrote an e-mail to Mr. Ashley today, via
his website e-mail address, and I asked him to clarify his involvement. I
believe I read in the Press-Enterprise that he had divested himself of his
Valley Bank stock in anticipation of his Board of Supervisors campaign, and
perhaps he has done the same with whatever his interest in the GlobalPort
may be. Whether "divestment" ends his commitment to developing the
GlobalPort is another question.]
And, then we have
HENRY W. COlL, JR. President, Tilden-Coil Constructors,
Inc., along with
JACQUES S. YEAGER, SR. Director of the Board, E.L.
Yeager Construction Company, Inc.
And others. You don't need to take my word for it, the development
team, with short bios, can all be found on the
GlobalPort website.
So, if not March Cargo Port, then how do we bring the goods we need into
the Inland Empire? How do we get them out?
Those are fair and reasonable questions. Because keep in mind that
the decisions we are making
right now are the ones that are going
to govern and direct our City and County for years to come. Just as
LAX and Ontario simply keep getting bigger and bigger, so will March once
it begins.
Let's start with one simple question -- how much smog can we tolerate?
Because we are talking about massive increases in smog. We
are talking about smog levels that already exceed federal maximums and
are predicted to exceed federal maximums by 50% or more. We are talking
about smog levels that are the worst in the nation.
Jet cargo is not a good choice for our area for a number of reasons.
Overall, we need better planning solutions than
jumbo jets
emitting vast quantities of
uncontrolled,
unregulated pollution.
But when we think of the Inland Empire, we have to realize a few critical
things.
- We are in a natural basin that prevents smog from leaving
- Smog from Los Angeles generally blows into our area
- The Ontario airport is expanding and already brings us many tons
of aircraft and trucking pollution
- Our freeways are main thoroughfares for movement of goods in and
out of Los Angeles via truck
- Air cargo is energy inefficient and environmentally inefficient
Therefore, we require solutions that achieve the transportation mission
without choking our air. What are the options?
It seems to me, we need to develop high speed electric rail transportation
options throughout the Inland Empire and throughout the state. Rail
is more efficient. Electric trains would reduce overall pollution
and in particular, emissions need not be in the Inland Empire. High
speed trains would represent a better travel option than either air travel
or personal vehicle within California.
And finally, rail transportation is a proven technology. Europe
and Japan are far ahead of the US in rail transportation, since the US has
insisted on relying on air transportation.
The bottom line is you become a victim of the infrastructure you put
in place. A high pollution, inefficient, noisy infrastructure is not
the one that should define the Inland Empire. We can do better. The
choice is being made today.
Shel Daltrey
Shel-at-fastbk.com
rev. 7/25/02